By Godwin-Maria Utuedoye
With barely four days to the completion of his appointment as Minister of State for Labour and Employment, Festus Keyamo, SAN, Wednesday, told President Muhammadu Buhari that it is an aberration to appoint a Minister of State.
Keyamo, who made the damning indictment of the president, stated this in his speech at the valedictory session presided over by President Buhari to mark the end of the Federal Executive Council, FEC, under his (Buhari) administration, at the Council Chamber, Presidential Villa, Abuja.
The Minister of State, who also served as spokesperson of the recently dissolved All Progressives Congress (APC) Presidential campaign Council (PCC) that won the February 25 presidential election for the party and its presidential candidate, Bola Tinubu, thanked President Buhari for enriching his Curriculum Vitae, through the appointment, even as he noted that some other Ministers of State, have been grumbling and unable to be bold and speak out.
Recall that Keyamo was first assigned to the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs, upon his appointment, before he was re assigned to the Ministry of Labour and Employment
Keyamo said it would be difficult to assess the individual performances of the Ministers of State since their discretion was shackled under the discretion of the senior Ministers, stressing that any original ideas developed by a Minister of State are subject to clearance by another colleague in Cabinet before they can sail through for consideration by Council.
“Mr. President, you first appointed me as Minister of State in the Ministry Niger Delta Affairs in August, 2019 and you later redeployed me as Minister of State in the Ministry of Labour and Employment.
“Today, I cannot find the words to express the depth of my
gratitude to you for finding me
worthy, out of over two hundred
million Nigerians, to be nominated and subsequently appointed to serve as a Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. My
curriculum vitae has been greatly enhanced – forever.
“From my very humble beginnings in a small dusty town in Delta State where I was born and raised by my struggling parents, all the way to the Council Chambers at the Presidential Villa where I had the honour and privilege to participate weekly in decision-making for my country in the last four years, it has been like a fairy tale. I give God all the glory.
“What I am about to say, therefore, is not and should not be construed as an indication of ingratitude. Far from it. What I am about to say is just my own little contribution to our constitutional development as a relatively young democracy and to aid future governments to optimize the performance of those they appoint as Ministers.
“Mr. President, the concept or designation of “Minister of State”.
Is a constitutional aberration
and is practically not working for many so appointed. Successive governments have come and gone and many who were appointed as Ministers of State have not spoken out at a forum such as this because of the risk of sounding ungrateful to the Presidents who appointed them.
However, like I said earlier, this is not ingratitude.
“As a private citizen, I am on record to have gone to court a number of times to challenge unconstitutional acts of governments for the sake of advancing our constitutional democracy, so it will be out of character for me to have gone through government and be carried away by the pomp of public office and forget my role as a member of the Inner Bar and my self-imposed role over the years as a crusader for democracy and constitutionalism.”
Citing the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended),
Keyamo said, “Mr. President, I crave your indulgence to explain this constitutional conundrum of “Minister of State”.
Section 147 says “(1) There Shall be such offices of Ministers of the Government of the Federation as may be established by the President.
“(2) Any appointment to the office of Minister of the Government of the Federation shall, if the nomination of any person to such office is confirmed by the
Senate, be made by the President.
“(3) Any appointment under subsection (2) of this section by the President shall be in conformity with the provisions of section 14(3) of this Constitution:- provided that in giving effect to the provisions aforesaid the President shall appoint at least one Minister from each State, who shall be an indigene of such State.”
Also, Section 148 says, “(1) The President may, in his discretion, assign to the Vice-President or any Minister of the Government of the Federation responsibility for any business of the Government of the Federation, including the administration of any department of government.”
Keyamo further contended that “the 7th Schedule to the 1999 Constitution provides for the Oath of Office to which each Minister must subscribe. There are no different Oaths for “Minister” and “Ministers of State”.
They all take the same Oath of Office.
“In addition to the above, the Ministers-designate appear before the Senate and are grilled and cleared AS MINISTERS, not as Ministers in some instances and Ministers of State in some other instances. It is at the point of assignment of portfolios that successive Presidents then reclassified some as “Ministers of State.”
He contended that though the President has the constitutional powers to assign portfolio to his appointees, he said that such appointment must be in line with the constitutional provision.
He said, “Some may want to justify this by saying the President is given the discretion by the Constitution to assign whatever responsibility(ies) he likes to Ministers. Yes, I concede Mr. President